Movies Posts

Hollywood Help Me!

My last blog promised to turn over a new leaf and believe me it is very hard. Hollywood seems to not want to help me. They just keep on turning out the garbage. For instance Transformers director Michael Bay decided to kill the only black transformer (Jazz he was actually my favorite transformer) in the last movie and replace him with two more black transformers that can’t read and speak in jive. Michael how am I supposed to say anything positive about Transformers when you can’t keep your head out of your ass? Then there is Land of the Lost I do not understand why or how this movie even got made.

I guess all I am saying is that this summer movies are bordering on the side of lame. The summer blockbuster fun started well in May (which does not really count since it is not summer yet) with two movies I enjoyed Startrek and Terminator Salvation I enjoyed both movie because they were well written and the acting was top notch. Since it is June I figured it would be too late to do a review. So that ship has sailed. Now June is coming to an end with the only “blockbuster” this month has been Transformers I do not have to go see this movie to tell you it is lame. It is directed by Michael Bay he does not believe in telling a story or movies with a plot. In this movie there will be lots of running lots of chasing and lots of unrealistic explosions.

What do I have to look forward too.?

Well according to the yahoo summer guide for July and August:

JULY

Public Enemies- Looks like a good movie to watch and it has Johnny Depp and Christian Bale in it.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince- I am not a fan of Harry Potter but so far I have enjoyed the movies.

AUGUST

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra – Even though my lame meter is going off on this one, I have to say Ray Parks as snake eyes is a great choice and I will give this movie a chance.

Then there is District 9, this movie looks hot, the website is hot and fun to play with. There is not much about the story out there yet. It does however have this Starship Troopers / Cloverfield vibe to it.

That is what Hollywood has to offer this summer. How can I remain positive when in my mind there is only one movie I even want to see this summer. Lets all go see District 9 coming out August 14, 2009.

Post to Twitter

June 25, 2009 | 1 Comment

Bring Out Your Dead.

With Tuesday night’s episode of Deadliest Warrior (featuring William Wallace versus Shaka Zulu,) having aired, all the matches for this season that I’m actually interested in (read as: those that don’t involve guns) have now played out, and I can kick back and recline on the pile of dead losers until another season of ridiculousness rolls around. I must admit that I was a little disappointed in the Legends’ conflict, though.

With the exception that the warriors had names, it might have been any other episode of DW. Nothing particularly innovative in terms of testing debuted, in the end it was a lot of cut meat and broken stuff, coupled with the standard macho posturing. From the beginning, the Zulu team was losing, and as far as I’m concerned, they knew it. The more that you have to explain how your fighter’s style would allow you to avoid/overcome your opponent’s blows, the less of an advantage you’ve got. This and other lessons played out over the course of the ancient warrior fights; if I can bring myself to watch the modern ones, then I’ll come back and compare. But for now, here’s a recap:

Apache vs. Gladiator

The one that started it all.

The one that started it all.

My Initial assessment:
Holy crap, this show is awesome. Look at that guy punch that cow carcass with that thing! What? Aww, he got hit with an arrow’ he loses? Nuts.

The lesson: Range wins Deadliest Warrior, and the simulated battle at the end takes a fair amount of artistic license, despite all the hard science leading up to it.

Ninja vs. Spartan

The image so nice, I used it twice.

The image so nice, I used it twice.

My initial assessment:
This looks like another bad matchup of stealth versus strength. Take away the anime-style powers that real ninjas never had, and it seems to get worse. Perhaps the ninja will surprise us, but the Spartan seems to have more armor and a bigger shield than the Gladiator did, and I’m betting that the Spartan team will play up the shield-wall tactic.

The Aftermath: Armand Dorian said it best when he explained that “the Ninja could hurt the Spartan, but he couldn’t kill the Spartan.’ The Ninja was a skirmisher, the Spartan was a tank. A tank that rolled over the Ninja and barely paused to stop in the face of black eggs and shiruken.

The lesson: Catastrophic amounts of damage win Deadliest Warrior. While this isn’t a factor a lot of the time, considering that most of the weapons maim or kill pretty obviously, when a team talks more about how their fighter would be moving around (the Ninja and Shaka teams did a lot of hard selling on that angle), or how tough their warrior would be, and/or how little the opponent’s just-recorded X-bajillion pounds of pressure would be laughed off (the Maori and Viking teams did a lot of hard selling in that regard), they’re probably losing. The Samurai team is a bit of an exception to this rule, however…

Viking vs. Samurai

If Fuji were there, The Salt would have turned the tides.

If Fuji had been there, The Salt would have turned the tides.

My initial assessment:
This can’t end well for anyone. But it’ll probably be fun to watch. Either the Samurai knocks the Viking down with the one sword stroke that they are famous for, or the Viking goes berserk and lays into him with an axe.

The Aftermath: Like the Apache before him, the Samurai was an arguably better-trained warrior with a singular advantage- the bow and arrow. Katana vs.  Greataxe was pretty much irrelevant- both weapons were viciously effective. And in the weeks to come, range would prove more of a factor than anything else, whether it would take the form of a projectile, or a really long melee weapon.

The lesson: Range wins Deadliest Warrior, in case you’d forgotten.

Pirate vs. Knight

Scurvy againt Chivalry.

Scurvy againt Chivalry.

My Initial assessment:
Does the pirate have a pistol? If so, based solely on the severe advantage that the bow gave the Apache, the Pirate wins. I’m rooting for the Knight, though.

The Aftermath: The Pirate had 2 guns and a grenade.

A. GRENADE.

I cannot emphasize that enough. Even though the flintlock pistol was unable to penetrate the Knight’s armor, and the blunderbuss, well, blundered, the Pirate HAD A GRENADE! As far as non-powder weapons went, the Knight’s armor was more than effective, and the crossbow was comparable, but in the end, chivalry was truly dead.

The lesson: Technology wins Deadliest Warrior. Explosives also win Deadliest Warrior. Bullets win Deadliest Warrior as well, which is why I was disinterested in the modern warfare of Taliban vs. IRA, Yakuza vs. Mafia, and Green Beret vs. Spetznaz. It’s pretty obvious that guns kill people.

Maori Warrior vs. Shaolin Monk

Sleeper hit of the season.

Sleeper hit of the season.

My initial assessment:
I actually hadn’t been interested in this, and caught the repeat of it which played before Shaka Zulu vs. William Wallace. But it turned out to be an interesting matchup.

The Aftermath: The Maori weapons, while horrifyingly effective, were brittle, being made of animal parts and wood. How this affected the calculations of the final battle, I’ll never know, but in addition to that, the Shaolin’s twin hooks and chain were about twice the reach of the best that the Maori could bring to the table, on top of all his weapons being made of steel. In hindsight, this didn’t seem like a fair matchup.

The lesson: Technology (especially metallurgy) wins Deadliest Warrior. Range also wins Deadliest Warrior. Your warrior might laugh off some blows, but the gel gummies don’t lie. The fact that you might be moving around just means that you’ll lose a few more body parts before you go down.

William Wallace vs. Shaka Zulu

From Wikipedia!

From Wikipedia!

My initial assessment:
This sounds ridiculous, and not necessarily in a bad way. However, since Wallace is known for shooting lightning bolts from his arse, I think that Zulu will not have much of a chance in this matchup.

The Aftermath: While the arse-lightning did not play a part in the combat, pretty much every thing that I’ve mentioned so far came true over the course of this (which would likely have been the most controversial show, if not for the Terrorist Jamboree airing on Sunday Night, or the kerfluffle that seemed to have arisen in the wake of Viking vs. Samurai,) came true. The Shaka team spent a lot of time insisting that Shaka would be able to get under Wallace’s guard and shank him up, and played up the only advantage that they had- the range of the Iwisa, a wooden mace that could be thrown some 30 feet.

The lesson: There’s no real lesson here; it’s just the final exam.

Based on these assessments, and my own desire to determine who truly is the Deadliest Warrior, here is a brief rundown of what would happen if there had been a bracket system (and who knows, perhaps there is something in the works for next season. I’ve got my fingers crossed.)

Apache faces off with Spartan. Spartan uses his large shield to protect himself from Apache’s storm of arrows, closes and goes to town on Apache. Being considerably more heavily armored and better-trained than the Gladiator, the Spartan finishes the Apache with a blow from his shield, followed by a spear thrust to the lower spine. Spartan advances to Round 3.

Samurai faces off with Pirate. Pirate throws a grenade at Samurai. Samurai explodes. Pirate advances to Round 3.

William Wallace faces off against Shaolin Monk. The claymore is deadlier than the whip chain, and has almost the same reach as the linked twin hooks. Combine that with chainmail and the targe shield, and Wallace takes Round 2 pretty easily, scoring a bye in Round 3, because he’s William Wallace and can name-drop, where the others are just stereotypes.

Spartan faces Pirate. Pirate shoots Spartan. Spartan armor, even the shield, is not as advanced as French plate, so Spartan keels over dead. Pirate might have to shoot him twice, but no grenade.

Pirate advances to finals to face William Wallace, and throws a grenade at him. Wallace lumbers through it. Pirate then shoots him twice, and Wallace dies.

Result: Pirate is the Deadliest Warrior, at least in the Ancient bracket. If you were to put a Green Beret in front of him, while he’s fumbling with flint and steel to light the fuse on his grenade, a magazine’s been emptied into his gut, spilling rum everywhere.

Pirate image by Marcus Ranum http://www.ranum.com/ , bombs by woodsy.

Pretty much sums it up.Pirate image (the same one as above) by Marcus Ranum (http://www.ranum.com ), bombs by woodsy.

I’ll see you in two weeks. Now that I’ve got nothing to watch on TV again, maybe I’ll find something else to talk about by then.

Post to Twitter

May 28, 2009 | No Comments

The Watchmen Came and went.

I loved this movie, I hated this movie.

Alright so I liked Watchmen. Watchmen was not a movie for regular people. It should have billed as an add-on for the comic. I like Watchmen because it created a moving visual to a comic I loved. It gave me what I yearned for at the moment. I think it had to do with the fact that I read the graphic novel so many times my mind fill in all the parts that were missing. If you read the comic you were thrilled to see some scenes on the big screen (in my case it was a super large screen I saw it at the IMAX).

Dr. Manhattan from comic to screen.

Dr. Manhattan from comic to screen.

To see Dr. Manhattan shrink, grow, teleport and dissintergrate was absolutely thrilling. Watching Rorschach’s face constantly change was something I wanted to see for years. The Nite Owl’s flying ship zipping into the sky. Everything in the movie looked very much like it did in the comic. It was very thrilling to see it. I really enjoyed the movie.

Comic to screen

Comic to screen

Half an hour after the movie the thrill wore off. If you never read the comic this was a very bad movie. I began to realize there was a lot missing from the movie that was in the comic. The missing parts gave the reader an understanding of the world the characters lived in. These parts would have also given the movie viewer a better understanding of the world. Of course it probably would have added another hour to the movie. The hardest part of the movie is the premise of the movie. It requires the viewer who have not read the comic to imagine the world of the 80′s in New York. So I did the math. Since the movie is rated R you have to be 18 years old to see this movie. If you are at least 18 that means you were born in 1991. New York in 1991 was on its way to becoming hooker and crime free (mostly). I remember seeing hookers in the street and being worried about crime. I was born in 1973. This is a movie for people who were born in the early to mids 70′s. You have to remember the fear of nuclear annihilation. The fear of the big red menace. If you are 18 you were born one year before the Soviet Union fell.

Then we have the dialogue which on the most part was taken right from the comic. For some reason it came off very flat and sometimes even lame. The dialogue works in the limited confines that a comic provides, which is a subject for another blog. Dialogue in a movie can be and often is the driving force of a movie. Add that to the fact most of Watchmen has characters with masks on. There is no facial expressions to match the dialogue of each character. So in the end I have to say as a movie Watchmen falls into the bad category.

The question remains; Could it have been a better movie? I do not think so. Sure some choices could have been made that would have made it a better movie. Maybe if they made it a trilogy. Maybe if they wrote better dialogue. In the end it still would not have been the Watchmen graphic novel. I keep thinking that they can do a much better job adapting and creating comic book movies. I have to say, I am wrong. Super hero comic books should remain comic books. Movies do not have the ability to give the characters what we comic book geeks love about superheros and their villains. There has only been a few times where this has worked. The last two Batman movies worked. Mostly because they started from scratch and rewrote the character to make movies that fit both worlds.

Matrix Heroes

Matrix Heroes

The only way to make movies that have comic book style characters is to start from

Jumper

Jumper

scratch. Stop adapting comic book character for movies. Start making comic book movies. Take a “Heroes” way of doing things. Movies like Jumper and Push are examples but are still adaptions from books. I guess the best example of a movie or movies are the Matrix Trilogy they created a world and some super heroes of that world.

Post to Twitter

March 18, 2009 | No Comments

The Watchmen is coming!

The Watchmen

The Watchmen

For those of you who do not know this about me, I am a Watchmen fanboy. Being a fanboy I am quite fearful of the upcoming film. You see to my kind the Watchmen is the bible of comics, there is nothing you can compare it to, and there will be nothing that can top it in the near future. Saying that and the fact that as far as I am concerned Hollywood can’t get there head out of their behinds long enough to realize how to make the perfect comic movie.

I do have faith though. Watchmen is being directed by Zack Snyder the same guy that gave us the comic adapted 300. Now there are people who did not like the movie 300, and there are people who loved it. I sit somewhere in the middle. As a story it had no where to go, personally I think it was a silly comic to make a movie out of. As a comic movie it was top

300 Graphic Novel Cover

300 Graphic Novel Cover

Zack Snyder photo by: Clay Enos

Zack Snyder photo by: Clay Enos

notch, 300 took what was on the comic page and gave it life and action and passion that a comic movie needs.

Another bit of faith I have about the Watchmen movie is the hairs on the back of my neck stand up every time I see the trailer. I can see the characters coming to life in the bits and pieces of the film they have lets us see. I can tell that they have the look of the film right. Since it is also a rated R film my hope is they have not taken the darkness out of the film.

I have faith and my expectations are very high. For me the movie has to turn out twice as good as 300, Sin City, or the last two Batman movies. I am however expecting a Lord of the Rings brand of commitment from this film crew. I want to come out of the movie in extreme awe at what they have accomplished. I am not looking for perfection in this, they do not have the time or the money to to put all the nooks and cranny’s of the comic into this film. They just have to get the right nooks and cranny’s in. That’s all for now. I will be seeing the movie on the seventh and will be giving all of you my opinion next week.

Peace,

Sean “Sapo” Pisano

Check out the trailer.

Post to Twitter

March 2, 2009 | No Comments

Miserly Behavior

I’d like to apologize for the missed updates- there were some issues with the server that took a surprisingly long time to fix. This post was supposed to go live back on the 11th, but the Powers That Be were not interested in helping me stay current. However, it’s still mildly relevant, seeing as today us Christmas and all, and the server is back now, I think, so it’s all good. The original lapse in server integrity also gave me the opportunity to stumble across this:

A Miser Brother’s Christmas

That’s right, in the tradition of the last few years, the stories and shows of yesteryear are being mined once again in the interests of making semi-new content. Unlike some other Xmas remakes and spinoffs in recent memory, this one stays true to the original medium, although the budget is clearly higher and the technical know-how is more advanced, which kind of takes away the original charm, in my opinion. It also seems like they’ve tried to flesh out the story of the Miser Brothers, give them some history to explain the reason for their mutual dislike, aside from the fact that they are polar (pun not intended) opposites, and maybe even make Heat Miser more of a sympathetic character. That last part worries me some, as I especially enjoy the gruff, almost belligerent Heat Miser from the original:

The Miser Bros’ song-and-dance routine from The Year Without a Santa Claus

As if the change in the musical tone and tempo and the hellish lair that Heat Miser inhabits were not enough, George Irving’s ponderous delivery and the slight changes in the lyrics (“they call me Heat Miser”, as opposed to ‘friends call me Snow Miser’, for example) lend a certain ominous power seasoned with thinly veiled threat. Snow Miser will turn your hat a snowball, change it back, and then take you out to lunch. Heat Miser will melt your bicycle while you’re sitting on it and dare you to get mad about it.

But the changes that they may be making are just part of the formula process that seems to be alive and well, (like the need for a love interest,) so I will just bite the bullet and hope for the best. On the whole, it looks like it just might be a satisfactory reprise of these two characters, as opposed to another attempt that I unfortunately stumbled across while researching this post:

(CAUTION: If you’re one of those people who felt Michael Bay ‘raped your childhood’ with the recent Transformers movie, or take similar offense at other resurrections of older works, you might want to skip the clip below. It’s not pretty.)

You were warned.

I’ll be watching (or at the very least taping) A Miser Brothers’ Christmas with low expectations, and looking for Rankin-Bass DVDs, for I am suddenly waxing very nostalgic.

See you in two weeks!

Post to Twitter

December 25, 2008 | Comments Off

David Hasselhoff: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D.!

In 1998 the brilliant people at Fox TV let Nick Fury: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. starring David Hasselhoff appear on television. Now I have to admit I have never seen the full TV movie. I only caught bits of it, really bad bits. I will not judge the whole movie by the parts I saw. It would not be fair. All I really have to say is David Hasselhoff as Nick Fury who thought that would be a good idea? But there are worse things out there. The very first Fantastic Four movie. It never made it to the theater, most people have never witness this horror, I was force to watch the whole thing. Still it was much better story wise that the crap they did release in the theater. Sure the Thing looked like an orange stay puff marshmallow man, and the special effect were so bad that it brought you to tears of laughter. They got the basics right and with a better budget it would have been a really good movie. Check it out a full write up at this site: www.i-mockery.com . Check out the trailer on this site: www.slashfilm.com. I should take another look at this movie. While doing the research on this Blog I remember how much I liked Doctor Doom’s costume. I wish that this was the only train wreck that is flying around out there.

David Hasselhoff: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D.! .The Thing (1994)

Here is a small list of what I call the awful comic book projects.

At the top of my list has to be:

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003) – Wow what a mess.

Then there are :

Batman & Robin (1997)
SuperGirl (1984) But hey it was the 80′s.
The Punisher (1989) (I have never seen the one from 2004 I am sure it sucked too.)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990)

There is a truckload of movies I am sure are really bad but I have not seen them all. Till next time…

Sean “Sapo” Pisano

Post to Twitter

May 16, 2008 | No Comments

Hello my name is Sapo and I am comic books junkie.

Yes I am a comic book junkie. Not the kind of junkie that needs that quick cheap fix. I need the good stuff. You can’t just throw together a comic and have it work for types like me. First the story has to be rock solid. If it’s a character that has been around for awhile you can’t just make him do something that does not make sense with his history. So as a comic book junkie (A conkie, my name for it.) and a love of all things celluloid, I feel the need to see every superhero movie that comes out. I have to say being the comic book snob that I am. I have not been impressed.

Until now…. Iron Man. I went in totally jaded; all I can think was man this is going to be another Spidermen 3.

I am now impressed. I liked this movie. I liked it allot. It was pure comic book. Not once did I feel like they were trying to explain anything to me. The special effects did not overwhelm the movie but enhanced it. I brought it hook line and sinker. I think the movie also worked for people who never read Iron Man. It was a fantastic lesson on how to do a comic book movie the right way. So I again say keep your Hollywood out of my comic books.

Go see the Iron Man movie encourage the powers that be to continue to make movies that reflect what the fans love about the comics they read.

Next Blog… Really bad comic book movie projects to check out. Hint Hint David Hasselhoff as Nick Fury…..

Post to Twitter

May 12, 2008 | No Comments

Spiderman 3 sucks monkey balls.

The best part of the movie was Stan “The Man” Lee’s cameo. To tell you the truth I did not have high expectations for the movie in the first place. Mostly I was bored by Peters struggles with his girl friend, his best buddy and now his dark side. I am so done with Mary Jane. I am done with all the villains being somehow connected to Peter Parkers life. I am completely done with everyone and their mother knowing who Spiderman is. For the love of god keep your mask on. It would have been nice if Spidey did not have to rescue Mary Jane again. Yes he has to rescue Mary Jane.

The fact is this is not the Spiderman I grew up with. In the comic, after Peter Parker got bite by the spider he went through some hard trials that lead him to becoming Spiderman. These trials lead him to becoming a stronger, confident, and mature man. He had responsibility’s that weighed heavy on him, Spiderman kept him focused. He never pined over any one woman, to me that makes him a weak little man, not capable of making emotional decision.

The problem I have with Peter Parker and Spiderman in the movie is that after three movies he is still the emotional cripple he was as a teenager. He is still learning the lesson of the wise old sage Ben Parker. When they finally give Peter Parker some balls it’s because he turned to the dark side. Even all the villains were teenage wimps it was like watching saved by the bell. The sandman was even whining at the end of the movie, I don’t mean to be a villain will you ever forgive me? I forgive you mister Sandman. It was like watching an after school special.

In conclusion this is the last Spiderman movie I will see. I have no faith in the movies. This movie was not all that different than the last two. I do not recommend anyone else spend their money on it. It only encourages their laziness. Wait till it come on DVD and rent it from Netflix.

Post to Twitter

May 9, 2007 | No Comments

Anime Boston 2007 – Days 0.5 and 0.75

Due to horrific time constraints, the slightly irregular comic blog will be pre-empted by a brief interlude about the convention that I am attending, namely, Anime Boston.

We left New York on Wednesday night (The Jackal was kind enough to drive us), and were safely in Boston sometime around midnight on Thursday morning. We perused the Jackal’s extensive DVD collection, watched the rather awful ‘Dark Fury,‘movie, and went to sleep.

Thursday morning proper found us asleep until 10ish, and then we got ready to face the day. We cleaned up and made our way to lunch at Fire and Ice, and after a short walk around Cambridge and Harvard Yard, we went over to the Hynes Center to set up the booth (pictures to come, I promise).

4 hours or so later, the booth was set up. At twice the size of the booth from last year, it looks rather impressive. It’s a pity that MegMan could not make it this year, but creative differences will do that to you.

Anyway, I will have far more to say tomorrow after the first night ends; we’re planning to go to ‘Southie’ after the Dealer’s Room closes, although we might end up skipping that in favor of the Friday Night dances- we’ve been at AB twice so far, but have actually seen very, very little of the con itself. I haven’t really seen anything in Boston aside from whatever we’ve driven past, and a few restaurants here and there, so whatever we end up doing, after the shift ends, it will be new to me.

Wish me luck; I’ll talk to you tomorrow, time permitting.

Post to Twitter

April 19, 2007 | No Comments

A break from the norm. (Or have you seen it???)

Often when I write about a movie or movies it is cause I don’t like the movie or the way the film industry has ruined a good thing. Today will be different. Today I want everyone to go out and pick up Little Miss Sunshine on DVD. If you do not ever see another movie for as long as you shall live this should be the one you keep in your memory banks. When it first came out I saw it in the theater, I think it is the only time a movie brought me to tears, from laughter. Nothing feels better than leaving a movie feeling great about something. I really felt uplifted. There were a few other movies out there that stayed with me when I left the theater. Which I will discuss in my next Blog.

What made Little Miss Sunshine A must see? Mostly the absolute human connection it had. If I was in their same place would I do the same thing? Maybe not, yet it would have crossed my mind. Endearing would be a word that best fits this movie. No matter how unreal your family seems you still love them, and stick with them no matter what the circumstances. Rather you should. Family’s are hard to deal with sometimes. Get use to it everyone goes through it.

Thats all for now go see Little Miss Sunshine.

Later

Sapo

Post to Twitter

January 17, 2007 | Comments Off